![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() Taking Sides, a 2001 movie directed by István Szabó and written by Ronald Harwood (based on his play), Any attempt to squeeze a complex historical/philosophical situation into the confines of a play or movie requires simplification and, to avoid a boring talk-fest, a large dose of poetic license. The script's focus on the mounting confrontations between the prosecutor and the artist is consistently enriched by atmospheric sets and cinematography – it opens as the camera tracks along row after row of German officers at a recreation of a Furtwängler concert, and ends as strains of Beethoven's Fifth (actually a Barenboim performance) follow the conductor down bureaucratic hallways and symbolically drown out the investigator's report to his superiors. Indeed, music appropriately provides an emotional context for much of the action, both literally (as when Furtwängler's recording of the Adagio from the Bruckner Seventh, The details which spark the dramatic incidents seem to run the gamut from plausibly accurate to wildly reckless. Among the more harmless but effective contrivances are a power failure abruptly ending Furtwangler's final Berlin concert (Speer, aware that the Gestapo is preparing to strike, using the occasion to suggest that Furtwängler looks tired and needs to get away for a while), Russian intrigue to bargain for Furtwängler's emigration, and a single 78 rpm side that impossibly holds both the first and second movements of Beethoven's Fifth. Far more dubious and invidious are speculative suggestions that the Berlin Philharmonic musicians conspired to concoct tales of Furtwängler's bravery, that Furtwängler's secretary procured groupies for his pleasure before each concert, and that damaging evidence lurks in a "Hinkel archive" (which sounds more like a satirical reference to Chaplin's Great Dictator than genuine history). And the concluding piece of newsreel footage, in which he appears to wipe himself off after shaking an official's hand, presumably intended to signal the director's ultimate empathy for Furtwängler's predicament, is so heavily edited as to appear fake and thus utterly worthless as the documentary evidence it purports to be. The central conflict is presented with sufficient ambiguity to raise appropriate questions without asserting simplistic answers. Taking Sides gives viewers much to ponder, not just about Furtwängler but the complex and lingering issues his case raises. Indeed, America is now heading toward its most partisan election in decades, with a startling number of voters not merely hoping for change but consumed by abject hatred of the present administration. If a citizen feels strongly that his government's behavior is irredemably immoral, just what should he do – apply all his energies to sway public opinion or disengage himself to await better times? How about artists, whose visibility imposes a special obligation to wield their influence responsibly – should they continue to perform in the hope that audiences will be drawn to their humanistic views, or should they demonstrate their disgust and emigrate? Do integrity and impact demand intensive activism or decisive retreat? While it's fine to ponder such moral issues with the comfort of intellectual abstraction, practical choices become limited in less tolerant societies and more trying times where dissent has dire consequences. The key point, of course, is that we all take sides. But when the stakes are high, the risk great and the outcome uncertain, what side do we take? Copyright 2004 by Peter Gutmann |
For a note about the illustrations, please click here.
![]() ![]() | |
![]() copyright © 1999-2004 Peter Gutmann. All rights reserved. |