data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e3c8/1e3c811ac0e9b9b6911fa9f85dd9e561b38dcaf2" alt="" |
Our consideration of the opera Salome explores the underlying
legend, its depictions in
prior art and literature, Oscar Wilde's play, Richard
Strauss's adaptation, the opera's structure, censorship in its early reception, Strauss's music,
later adaptations, early recordings of arias, complete recordings, and
some sources for further information.
|
|
The past century has seen an unprecedented acceleration of social
change – and with it a dwindling of esthetic sensitivity. As a result, nearly
all works of art that were deemed shocking or even bold in their time have
retained barely a shred of their former power and now seem historical
relics rather than genuine jolts. One of the very few exceptions is Richard
Strauss's 1905 Salome.
The
tale of Salome began two millennia ago.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65abc/65abc426bd2fedca54b1fb4d814b520bb5ee247d" alt="St. John the Baptist, by Titian" Titian: St. John the Baptist |
John the Baptist was a prophet in
the tradition of Isaiah, railing against sinful behavior. To purify their bodies after they had cleansed
their souls with a commitment to righteous living he immersed his
followers in the Jordan River. (This was not a novel
practice, as there are numerous references to it in the Old Testament. The
ritual purification bath persists in Jewish observance today in the form of
mikvah.) He hailed the coming of the Messiah and is
thought to have baptized Jesus. (He also appears to have been a keen
ecologist long before the trends of our time – he is reputed to have lived in
the desert, dressed in a camel hair garment with a leather belt, and
subsisted on locusts and wild honey.)
The earliest accounts differ in a key detail as to the cause for John's
demise. The Jewish historian Josephus reported in his Antiquities of the
Jews that Herod the Tetrarch (the regional Roman ruler of Galilee),
fearing that John's growing influence might foment a rebellion, had him
imprisoned and then put to death. (Although written c. 94 AD, the oldest
copy of the Josephus manuscript dates only to the 11th century, yet
scholars tend to credit its authenticity despite ample opportunities for
revision by dozens of generations of editors.) Josephus adds a further
cogent detail – that Herod's brother (known as Herod the Great) and his wife Herodias had a
daughter and that shortly after the birth Herodias "taking it into her head to
flout the way of our fathers, married Herod the Tetrarch, her husband's
brother by the same father, who was tetrarch of Galilee; to do this she
parted from a living husband," a severe sin at the time.
Biblical accounts link these two seemingly disparate strands to provide
a more personal motive for John's death. According to the Gospels of
Matthew and Mark, Herodias wanted to kill John because he condemned
her incestuous remarriage, but Herod the Tetrarch protected John as a holy man and
simply had him imprisoned. Then, as recounted in the flowing text of the
King James version (Mark 6: 21-28):
Herod [the Tetrarch] on his birthday made a supper to
his lords, high captains, and chief estates of Galilee; And when the
daughter of … Herodias came in, and danced, and pleased Herod
and them that sat with him, the king said unto the damsel, "Ask of me
whatsoever thou wilt, and I will give it thee." … And she went forth,
and said unto her mother, "What shall I ask?" And she said, "The
head of John the Baptist." And she came in straightway with haste
unto the king, and asked, saying, "I will that thou give me by and by in
a charger [i.e., on a platter] the head of John the Baptist." And the
king was exceeding sorry; yet for his oath's sake, and for their sakes
which sat with him, he would not reject her. And immediately the king
sent an executioner, and commanded his head to be brought: and he
went and beheaded him in the prison, and brought his head in a
charger, and gave it to the damsel: and the damsel gave it to her
mother.
The Gospels do not name Herodias's daughter, but Josephus does –
Salome.
Despite the brevity and detachment of its narrative, the
Biblical tale infers a tantalizing glut of salacious passion – revenge! lust!
corruption! blood! remorse! – none of which was lost on artists (or their
patrons) who could indulge and portray these wicked fantasies in the guise
of devotion to a sacred text. Indeed it became a favorite subject of Italian
Renaissance painters, albeit in the idealized, ornamental style of the time.
Consider, for example, the rich sheen and repressed expressions in the
early 16th Century painting by Bernardino Luini (in the Boston Museum of
Fine Arts),
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3dc5b/3dc5b60356e014f4db85bd1348e6c67170185646" alt="Luini: Salome Receiving the Head of St. John the Baptist" Luini: Salome Receiving the Head of St. John the Baptist |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2873a/2873a066d4dbdccd72ed385c423678cb49681ec2" alt="Gozzoli: The Dance of Salome" Gozzoli: The Dance of Salome |
which suggests only the barest hint of emotional anguish or
physical pain – Salome seems merely wistful, while John appears to have
prayerfully accepted his fate. Or consider the 1462 altarpiece panel by
Benozzo Gozzoli, which illustrates three incidents in the narrative – Salome
dancing before Herod and his guests, John about to be beheaded, and
Salome presenting her prize to Herodias, all combined in a single edifying
composition. While such early depictions are mostly chaste and sanitized,
they presumably sufficed to stoke viewers' imaginations rather than merely
helping to educate the illiterate. In the Romantic era discretion ceded to
more graphic fantasies, often providing an opportunity to paint Salome
partially or fully nude in the throes of an erotic dance. Most influential
of all, at least for present purposes, were two 1876 works by Gustav
Moreau, rumored to have been created in response to opium-induced
hallucinations, and full of mystical, surreal, symbolic dream imagery –
"Salome Dancing Before Herod," an oil painting with sumptuously rich and
complex surface depth on which he reportedly labored for seven years,
and "L'apparition," one of several similar watercolors that was
hugely popular, having been acclaimed at the 1876 Salon and
subsequently exhibited in the Louvre.
A parallel trend of embroidering the simple tale emerged in the
literature of the late 19th Century. Many authors added elements of fantasy
that enhanced the legend and would wend their way into its most
prominent operatic version. Perhaps the most elaborate arose in Joris-Karl Huysman's 1884 A Rebours (Against the Grain / Against
Nature), in which the protagonist purchases both Moreau works and
rhapsodizes at great length over their splendor, conjuring intricate psychic,
and unabashedly erotic, images. Indeed, the language itself throbs with
unbridled passion. Consider:
Elle commence la lubrique danse … ses seins
ondulent et, au frottement de ses colliers qui tourbillonnent, leurs
bouts de dressent; sur la moiteur de sa peau les diamants,
attachés, scintillent; ses bracelets, ses ceintures, ses bagues,
crachent des étincelles; sur sa robe triomphale, couturée des
perles, ramagée d'argent, lamée d'or, la cuirasse des orfčvreries
dont chaque maille est une pierre, entre en combustion, croise
des serpenteaux de feu, grouille sur la chair mate, sur la peau
rose thé, ainsi que des insectes splendides aux élytres
éblouissants, marbrés de carmin, ponctués de jaune aurore,
diaprés de bleu d'acier, tigrés de vert paon. |
She begins the lewd dance … her breasts quiver
and, rubbed lightly by her swaying necklaces, their rosy points stand
pouting; on her moist skin glitter clustered diamonds;
from her bracelets, her belts, her rings, dart sparks of fire; over her
robe of triumph, bestrewn with pearls, broidered with silver, studded
with gold, a corselet of chased goldsmith's work, on each mesh a
precious stone, seems ablaze with coiling fiery serpents, crawling
and creeping over the pink flesh like gleaming insects with dazzling
wings of brilliant colors, marbled with scarlet, patterned with yellow
dawn, mottled with steely blue, striped with peacock green.
|
Gustave Flaubert elaborated the bare Biblical narrative in
Herodias, the last of his 1877 Trois Contes (Three Tales),
by casting it as the culmination of a political intrigue in which the title
character endures a lengthy harangue from John and then recalls her
daughter from exile to wreak revenge.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73541/73541ac25ac1eb11b6482bcf616454a8f918fda3" alt="Moreau: Salome Dancing Before Herod" Moreau: Salome Dancing Before Herod |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae675/ae6751b733879be6ac60eaa39c2e1489e438cbf4" alt="Moreau: The Apparition" Moreau: The Apparition |
In a wicked psychological twist, "for
many months her mother had caused [Salome] to be instructed in dancing
and other arts of pleasing with the sole idea that … the tetrarch should fall
in love with her fresh young beauty and feminine wiles" both to retaliate
against John and to regain power over her weak husband whose love had
faded. Of course, the plot succeeded: "Her arms, her feet, her clothing
even, seemed to emit streams of magnetism that set the spectators' blood
on fire. … Even the crabbed, elderly priests gazed upon her with dilated
nostrils." Defenseless, Herod promises her the world but accedes
to her gruesome demand.
Heinrich Heine's 1841 epic poem Atta Troll took substantial
liberty with the story but introduced the notion of a depraved but amorous
fixation on the severed head, expressed in a tone of gentle derision.
Heine envisioned Herodias as a lover of the Baptist who "perhaps a little
peevish with her swain had him beheaded," became mad, "died of love's
distraction" and rode through the air, whirling the bloody head above her
"with childish laughter" and catching it "like a plaything." As for the logic of
deeming Herodias to be the Baptist's lover, "Else there were no
explanation / Of that lady's curious longing – / Would a woman want the
head of / Any man she did not love?"
Salome also had inspired Hériodiade, an 1881 opera by Jules
Massenet, its libretto a heavily romanticized adaptation of the Flaubert
account. This time it is Salome who is enamored of John, who comforts
her while she is in exile following the marriage of Herodias to Herod, who,
in turn, is in love with Salome. Amid much political intrigue, Herod has the
Prophet executed both at the urging of Herodias as payback for
condemning her and to fulfill his illicit love of their daughter. At a lavish
banquet Salome tries to kill her mother and then, in despair, stabs
herself.
And then
came Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900), whose 1892 play was the most
extensive treatment of all, both a synthesis of its predecessors and a
strikingly original conception of sheer perversity and unabashed eroticism.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4107d/4107df20dc666bd7aceb88d5706e4d625f65fb24" alt="Oscar Wilde" Oscar Wilde |
Salome seemingly was an atypical subject for a
lecturer on esthetics and the author of witty drawing-room social critiques.
Yet Wilde had a biting disdain for conventional morality, as is manifest in
some memorable adages from the introduction to his only novel, The
Picture of Dorian Gray (which fairly bursts with them):
- "There is no such thing as a moral or an immoral book."
- "Books are well written or badly written. That is all."
- "The morality of art is the perfect use of an imperfect medium."
- "Vice and virtue are to the artist materials for an art."
- "An ethical sympathy in an artist is an unpardonable mannerism of
style."
Nor did he shy from criticism: "Diversity of opinion about a work of art
shows that the work is new, complex and vital." Wilde reportedly was well
versed in the historical models of Salome, but was especially
drawn to the treatments by Moreau and Flaubert and was further inspired by the
simple, enigmatic and cryptic symbolist prose style of Maurice Maeterlinck.
Written in a single marathon session, his play was published in French in
March 1893, translated into English by his lover, Lord Alfred Douglas,
and then substantially revised prior to its British publication by Wilde himself, who
was bilingual.
Considered shocking and scandalous, performances were widely
banned. Sarah Bernhardt's plans to mount the premiere in England
collapsed when the Lord Chamberlain refused to license it on the ground that representations of Biblical characters were forbidden (a dubious pretext, since depictions of Samson, Moses and even Jesus somehow routinely managed to
pass muster).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/430ef/430efd210662f0138d969357227ea5b2bc7a09de" alt="Oscar Wilde Self Portrait (1892)" Beardsley Self-portrait |
Its premiere was finally given in Paris, but not until
1896, by which time its author had been imprisoned for "the love that dare not
speak its name" (the result of a foolish attempt to pursue a libel suit
against a nobleman whose accusation of sodomy proved quite truthful.)
In the meantime, its English publication in 1894 added a new, highly
influential element – drawings by 21-year old Aubrey Beardsley (who
would die only four years later).
His first, and most famous, depiction was
a single image, "J'ai Baisé ta Bouche, Iokanaan" ("I Have Kissed
Your Mouth, Jokanaan"), in an April 1893 London journal, which drew
Wilde's admiration. (Jokanaan is the Hebrew name for John and is used
throughout the play and opera.) Indeed, Wilde presented Beardsley with a copy
of the play inscribed, "To Aubrey, the only artist who, besides myself,
knows what the dance of the seven veils is, and can see that invisible
dance." Commissioned by publisher John Lane to illustrate the English
edition, after substitutions and censorship (largely over explicitly-rendered
genitals) Beardsley produced 13 drawings, including a title page. While
some ("Enter Herodias," "The Eyes of Herod," "The Dancer's Reward")
clearly relate to the narrative, several others ("The Woman in the Moon," "The
Peacock Dress," "The Toilette of Salome") do not. Susan Owens
considers them satiric and a caricature of the play, owing to their
disjuncture from the text, their visual jokes and obscene details, their grotesque bodily and facial
features, and their incoherence as a uniform suite (all of which, in her view, serve to call attention to themselves). Wilde apparently
grasped this as he called the title page "quite dreadful." Despite their
varying styles, all of Beardsley's drawings were done in black ink in a stark
art-nouveau style and certainly reflect the unabashed audacity of the play,
if not its actual narrative. They also set a standard for gesture and décor
that would influence stagings and adaptations.
Despite
bans elsewhere, Wilde's Salome found a welcome in Germany. It
was at a November 1902 Reinhart production in Berlin that Richard
Strauss (1864 - 1949) encountered it. Strauss was known
primarily as a conductor and the composer of tone poems in the tradition
of Liszt. In the decade from Aus Italien (From Italy) (1887) through
Don Juan, Tod und Verkärung (Death and Transfiguration),
Macbeth, Till Eulenspiegel, Also Sprach Zarathustra (Thus Spoke
Zarathustra) Don Quixote and Ein Heldenleben (A Hero's
Life) (1898) he "dealt with massively grandiose conceptions and a series
of very literal pictorial or characteristic episodes that stretched the
boundaries of purely musical form to the limit" (Tethys Carpenter). His
penultimate tone poem seemed to have exhausted his inspiration in the
genre – the bloated 45-minute Symphonia Domestica (Domestic
Symphony) (1903) was an idealized musical portrait of a day in his own
family life, ranging from sugary cooing of his baby to a fugal quarrel and a
rather literal depiction of love-making (with separate climaxes for himself
and his wife). Strauss wrote Salome from August 1903 through
September 1904 and completed the scoring in August 1905.
Given his temperate propensities to that point, many observers have
wondered at the depths from which Strauss suddenly summoned the
acute caustic spur for Salome (and its equally jarring successor,
Elektra [1908]).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97c09/97c09110e862763b0126924768c84707ef8b2f4e" alt="Richard Strauss" Richard Strauss |
They further grope to explain the irony of
composing a radical and decadent opera concurrently with a tone poem
celebrating blissful domesticity. Perhaps it was ego – when chided for his
ostentatious personal display in the Symphonia Domestica,
Strauss stated: "I don't know why I should not write a symphony about
myself. I find myself as interesting as Napoleon or Alexander."
Howard Goodall offers another intriguing perspective – that Strauss's
newly rebellious style was his artistic revenge on the society that had
snubbed his first two operas. Guntram (1894) had been an abject
failure, undoubtedly due to Strauss's unabashed imitation of his then-idol
Wagner, both in the music and his own insipid libretto that finds a medieval
singer in search of redemption.
Feuersnot (In Need of Fire) (1901) barely fared better. It was a social satire based on a bawdy Flemish
legend in which a humiliated suitor, ridiculed by the mayor's virgin
daughter, exacts revenge through a spell that extinguishes all the town's
fires that can only be lit from the heat of her first orgasm, which the suitor
nobly agrees to educe and which Strauss depicts explicitly in a
blazing orchestral passage. (Although the opera was condemned as
obscene, it was a rather pale adaptation of the raunchy original legend, in
which the girl had to strip, kneel on a table, and relight each fire from a
flame that sprung from her backside as all the townsfolk passed by.)
According to Goodall, Strauss's retaliation was Salome.
Interestingly, after the esthetic explosion of Salome, both Wilde and
Strauss (after Elektra) returned to the innocuous world of their
earlier work – Wilde with witty social critiques (Lady Windermere's Fan,
An Ideal Husband, The Importance of Being Earnest) and Strauss
with operas of comic fantasy (Der Rosenkavalier, Ariadne auf Naxos,
Intermezzo) to which he devoted himself exclusively until the chamber
works of his final years.
The Viennese poet Anton Lindner offered to adapt the Wilde play into a
libretto and sent some sample scenes, but Strauss opted instead for a
fairly literal translation of the French original by Hedwig Lachmann.
Although often hailed as the first opera to use an entire existing text, it was
preceded by Debussy's 1892
Pelléas et Mélisande, set to nearly the full Maeterlink play. Moreover, Strauss did not set the whole play, but rather streamlined the text by
removing about half; as analyzed by Roland Tenschert, he eliminated
much of the theological contentions and the characters' motives and
backgrounds, tweaked subordinate clauses that impaired the precision of
the diction, reordered some words for more flowing melodic lines, and
removed some metaphors, similes and repetitive language (while adding
others for regularity and symmetry).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32b03/32b036738267ab74953bb98975af0222c246ffc3" alt="Title page to the first English edition" Title page – first English edition |
(He also removed much of the
extraneous amorous interplay between a male page and the captain of the
guard, which seemingly was far more meaningful to Wilde than to Strauss.)
In any event, as characterized by Anna Amalie Abert, the result was nervous,
neurotically-charged language of breathless brevity, completely at variance
with the smooth continuity of the prevailing libretto style, yet eminently
suited for treatment with musical motifs (which Norman del Mar considers
a natural extension of Strauss's development of thematic germs in his tone
poems).
Indeed, the text all but demanded a radical musical setting, which
Strauss amply provided. In 1942, Strauss recalled his goals as providing
the "authentic Eastern color and vibrant sunshine" that he felt most
"Hebrew and oriental" operas lacked, He sought to achieve this through
"truly exotic harmony that shimmered, especially in the strange cadences,
like iridescent silk," including whole-tone scales, remote tonalities and
bitonality, the last in order to depict the friction between sharply delineated and
disparate personalities. The instrumentation is complex, creatively utilizing a
huge orchestra with strings divided into as many as 11 parts to achieve
extraordinary effects, including multiple harmonies. Indeed Paul Henry
Lang considers Salome an orchestral opera in which the vocal
parts struggle to project character against the onslaught of eloquent
instrumentation and composer Gabriel Fauré called it "a symphonic poem
with vocal parts added." Abert credits Strauss with
associating characters with keys – e.g., John with A-flat, Salome with C-sharp.
Others point to Wagnerian associative tonality, by which Strauss correlated
a key with a dramatic element. As an example, Derrick Puffett notes that
Strauss draws a connection between Salome (C-sharp major) and the
moon (its enharmonic of D-flat major). The complexity increases with
polytonality – Craig Ayrey notes that when Salome finally kisses
Jokanann's mouth, we hear superimposed chords of c-sharp (representing
her desire) and f-sharp (eroticism), yielding a bitter dissonance that
underlines the plot's consequence of this fulfillment.
Goodall cites it as "the most dissonant chord that had ever been heard"
and contends that it is "hard to find a more aggressively uncomfortable
combination of notes."
Both play
and opera are cast in a single continuous act in real time (about 100
minutes) on a moonlit night on the terrace of Herod's palace. Salome,
bored, emerges from a banquet, is enthralled by the voice of Jokanaan's
mystical prophecies and entices Narraboth, the captain of the guard, to
disobey orders and bring the Prophet out of the cistern in which he is imprisoned.
Her fascination oscillates between revulsion and lust as he repulses her
advances and finally returns to the cistern. Drunken, wearied by
arguments with Herodias and a chorus of quarrelsome Jews,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b185/5b18582b281565a94898dcbd296664831310a994" alt="Beardsley: The Eyes of Herod" Beardsley: The Eyes of Herod |
and longing
for Salome, Herod induces her to dance by promising any reward she
desires. Although at this point the opera is nearly two-thirds over, its real business
now begins with the two most striking and popular segments.
First, Salome performs the "Dance of the Seven Veils," often heard in
concert and on record as a free-standing orchestral piece. Del Mar calls it banal
but brilliant, tossing together a potpourri of tunes from the opera, albeit in a
way that Mann considers mechanical and thematically meaningless, with a
result that Del Mar likens more to a Viennese waltz than to evoking the authentic
Eastern color Strauss claimed to have sought. Consistent with Strauss
having written it last, Heinz Becker considers the Dance a symphonic flashback in
which Salome's emotional experiences are summed up, a catalog of past
events and motives heard throughout the opera, all leading to "the most
stunning contrast – a pause of total silence which makes manifest the
speechlessness of the world." Ernest Krauss finds it dominated by
the inner turmoil of Salome's corrupt psyche.
Staging the Dance encounters two fundamental challenges. First, Strauss aptly characterized Salome as the implausible combination of a 16-year old girl with the voice of an Isolde. At
the risk of sounding callous let's just say that very few divas who can
generate the huge vocal power of the title role have figures that are apt to
convincingly lure Herod into his reckless bargain, much less dance without
seeming grotesque.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96390/963902902d8a325b701fa94a8c0a342c454d309d" alt="Beardsley: The Belly Dance" Beardsley: The Belly Dance |
Indeed, the first Salome was Marie
Wittich, a prominent Wagnerian soprano with a suitably ample girth, who
launched the common practice of substituting a lithe ballerina for the
dance. A second problem is just how much to reveal. Early productions
teased with then-suggestive outfits, while some modern productions drape
Salome literally in seven veils and even opt for a climax of full nudity. Strauss
was quite clear as to his view, rebuking "the music-hall exoticism of some
of the later productions with their snake-like writhings [that] often exceeded
the bounds of decency and good taste." He insisted: "Anyone who has
ever visited the Orient and observed the propriety of the ladies there will
understand that Salome, a chaste virgin, can only be played with the
simplest, most refined gesticulation unless she is to awaken only horror
and disgust instead of pity." Indeed, he insisted that for maximum impact
all the acting should be "confined to the utmost simplicity, in contrast to the
overly-excited music." Both issues are tackled in a 1990 Deutsche Oper
video led by Giuseppe Sinopoli in which 42 year old Catherine Malfitano
not only triumphs vocally but manages a highly stylized dance
(choreographed by Bernd Schindowski) consistent with the angular gestures of the staging, albeit ending fully nude under a very sheer veil that
comes across as more crass than beguiling (and that comes completely
off at the climax). (In a less daring 1997 Covent Garden Decca video
conducted by Christoph von Dohnanyi she remains fully robed and dances
more conventionally, turning portions into an enticing pas de deux
with Herod.) Audio recordings, of course, avoid such issues altogether,
leaving visualization of the entire Dance to the listener's imagination.
The dance concluded, to Herod's alarm and her mother's delight,
Salome rebuffs Herod's attempts to dissuade her with fabulous gifts and
insists upon the head of Jokanaan which, after great suspense fueled by
grating harmonics played high on the double bass, the executioner delivers on a silver
platter. Then begins a riveting apostrophe, unmatched in all of opera for
its sheer queasy perversity, in which medium and message painfully
collide; as John Williamson notes, Strauss's surfaces lend an esthetic
glamour to the hysterical and depraved. Accompanied by spectacularly
gorgeous music that in other contexts would buoy the most glorious surge
of pristine natural love, Salome addresses the gory head, pouring out her
obsession before the horrified court:
Ah! Thou wouldst not suffer me to kiss thy mouth,
Jokanaan.
Well, I will kiss it now.
I will bite it with my teeth as one bites a ripe fruit. …
Her soliloquy continues:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01960/0196006382465c1a91b47751d798bda3e8585771" alt="Beardsley: The Dancer's Reward" Beardsley: The Dancer's Reward |
If only he had submitted to her love rather than
ignoring her and speaking evil:
Ah! Jokanaan, thou wert beautiful.
Thy body was a column of ivory set upon feet of silver.
It was a garden full of doves and lilies of silver. …
In the whole world there was nothing so red as thy mouth.
Thy voice was a censer and when I looked at thee I heard a strange
music.
She concludes: "the mystery of love is greater than the mystery of death."
Seized with foreboding, Herod has the torches extinguished and flees in
horror, as Herodias gloats and Salome persists, at first faintly and then
rising to triumph:
Ah! I have kissed thy mouth, Jokanaan.
Ah! I have kissed thy mouth.
There was a bitter taste on thy lips.
Was it the taste of blood?
No! But perchance it is the taste of love.
They say that love hath a bitter taste.
But what of that? What of that?
I have kissed thy mouth, Jokanaan.
I have kissed thy mouth.
At last, unable to bear any more, Herod orders his guards to kill her as the
mood is shattered with crashing, violently dissonant chords (abruptly
plunging from the distant fantasy of C-sharp major to the harsh earthy
reality of C minor) – Goodell calls it a "musical earthquake" and
suggests that it could represent Salome's first sexual consummation at the
very moment of her death.
Salome's oration crystallizes the work's essential tension between text and music, which prompted a groundswell of
condemnation from established critics who expectedly bridled against its
assault upon convention. Much of their censure arose from loathing
Wilde's lifestyle rather than his play or Strauss's opera. Thus Adam Röder
asserted in 1907, "If sadists, masochists, lesbians and homosexuals
come and presume to tell us that their crazy world of spirit and feeling is to
be interpreted as manifestations of art, then steps must be taken in the
interests of health. Art has no interest in sanctifying bestialities which arise
from sexual perversity."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a70e7/a70e7b6f17ea23b8c074594bd2ad5d2a2bef50d0" alt="The Dresden opening" The Dresden opening |
Max Kalbeck, reviewing the premiere in the
Weiner Tagblatt, called Wilde an "erotomaniac," his play "fertilizer"
and the result "like a circus freakshow, a voluptuously disgusting feast for
the senses." Writing in the 1908 edition of Grove's Dictionary of
Music and Musicians, J. A. Fuller Maitland assured readers that
"music itself cannot be prostituted to base use, though various qualities
incidental to music may be turned to the purposes of pornography. … It
would be going too far to say that any of the music itself would have a
morally harmful influence on anyone."
Censorship seemed an inevitable consequence. Indeed, although the
Dresden premiere was a huge success, generating 38 curtain calls, the
Vienna Censorship Board refused Mahler's attempt to mount the opera
there due to the "objectionable nature of the whole story. … Sexual
pathology is not suitable for our Court stage." The New York dress
rehearsal (foolishly given on a Sunday morning right after church) was
excoriated by a physician in a New York Times letter as "a detailed
and explicit exposition of the most horrible, disgusting, revolting and
unmentionable features of degeneracy that I have ever heard, read of or
imagined." Not to be outdone, H. E. Krehbiel, the New York
Tribune critic, cited the "moral stench" of the "pestiferous work" that
was "abhorrent, bestial and loathsome." After a single performance
dismayed patrons quashed the rest of the run. Salome would not
be heard again in New York until 1934.
Elsewhere ridiculous accommodations were demanded. The Kaiser
allowed presentation in Berlin only if a Star of Bethlehem appeared on the
backdrop at the end.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d698/6d6989678b17aff9258ed803353ccbbbcd52885e" alt="Leon Herbo: Salome (1889)" Leon Herbo: Salome (1889) |
In London the Lord Chamberlain insisted that
Jokanaan be renamed "The Prophet," refused display of the severed
head, and required that references to Salome's passion be changed to
spiritual longing. Thus, Salome addresses an empty platter by singing, "If
you had looked upon me you would have blessed me" (rather than "loved
me"). (John Culshaw not only notes the hypocrisy of allowing presentation
of the play but not the opera, but also contends that the bowdlerized form
was more offensive than the original, due to its futile attempt to
disguise obvious sexual desire in the cloak of religious piety.)
Strauss was not one to deny the value of controversy: "The most
certain road to universal fame is to have a work banned by the censor."
Indeed, he had the last laugh, recalling in 1942: "On one occasion [Kaiser]
Wilhelm II said, 'I'm sorry Strauss composed this Salome. He is
going to do himself a lot of harm with this.' Thanks to this harm, I was able
to afford my villa at Garmisch!"
By
focusing on the play, early critics tended to dismiss the music as largely
needless. Wilde had described the prose of his play as having "refrains
whose recurring motifs make it like a piece of music and bind it together
like a ballad." Robert Hirshfeld wrote in the Weiner Abendpost that
the music had no esthetic reason, as the play had its own rhythms,
syncopation of thoughts, pauses and melding of harmonious and dissonant
words (and this in the German translation) – and so Strauss's contribution
"represents what is most annoying in art – superfluous and inorganic."
Writing in the same issue, Julius Korngold agreed: "If a poet makes his
own music, the last thing he needs is another one." Kalbeck felt that even
beyond the Dance the orchestra overwhelmed the stage action with
"colossal exaggeration" that "strips the text of subtlety." Indeed, Strauss's contribution
was belittled as not only pointless but superficial, literal and uninspired;
Stravinsky, on the cusp of his own Rite of Spring, called it
"triumphant banality." In that regard, comparisons with Wagner were
inevitable. Hirschfeld hailed Wagner's texts as designed to interweave
with his music, while Korngold asserted that "Wagner touches our feelings
with new greatness and beauty" while with Strauss he "felt nothing after the
curtain falls – the audience goes away empty." But such commentary
ignores that the two composers' approaches were intentionally disparate.
Consider the final arias of Salome and Wagner's Ring.
Wagner supports and invigorates the noble words and underlying theme of
Brunhilde's "Immolation Scene" with suitably glorious accompaniment
whereas Strauss's equally absorbing music deliberately contrasts with the
sheer perversity of Salome's fulfillment.
More recent commentary invariably focuses on the music and largely
disregards the text. Henry Carse disparages Strauss's orchestration as
highly skilled yet inclined to seek novelty by overloading the score,
aiming at mere oddity and striving after elaborate effects. Another critic
chided that he felt Strauss's orchestra was incomplete and suggested that
for his next opera he should include "four locomotives with double boilers,
three foghorns and a battery of howitzers." Yet William
Mann cites the score as the most brilliant and far-reaching of all of
Strauss's works for the very reason that repelled early critics – its
deliberate disconnect between the aloof personages and its melodic
richness and lyricism, as well as its musical characterization, thematic
sculpture and coloring.
SOME SALOME THEMES
Salome's motif
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbd30/bbd301285b2670603661a64fabd8d9580a079cd0" alt="Salome's motif:"
The lilting, sultry Dance:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9641/a964198b885aa0533041a0de341e5dc1deb79f18" alt="The lilting, sultry Dance"
The Prophet's two themes:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90584/9058412c9c2aaeeb31aa944eaa3902e031cebe57" alt="The first Prophet theme"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59fc1/59fc1a0b907328d1054676b7159437d762141f7b" alt="The second Prophet theme"
The two variants of Salome's kiss:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba4e4/ba4e403da730a9dd3a9f74f4279f287a610a2871" alt="Salome's kiss - version 2"
Salome's lust:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d422/9d4224725ee36108b35931b535f7980cedd13e42" alt="Salome's lust"
|
Composers, too, were elated. Gabriel Fauré considered the themes mediocre,
but "developed, worked and interwoven with such marvelous skill that their
intrinsic interest is exceeded by the magic of an orchestral technique of
real genius," Maurice Ravel cited the
"burning hot wind that storms the soul," and Paul Dukas avowed that it
disclosed to him formerly unknown secrets of orchestration. Conductor
Erich Leinsdorf cites as his favorite examples of Strauss's musical
subtlety "Salome's opening phrases in free rhythm that bespeak her
restless flightiness," tonal coloring that depicts the dampness of the
cistern, the sudden thinning of the texture when Salome first sees the gaunt prophet to suggest the collapse of
her fantasies, and Herodias
singing in a key that clashes with the accompaniment as Herod proclaims
"Your voice wearies me." Others tend to belittle the sweet harmonies and
insipid melodies that accompany Jokanaan's proclamations as unduly blatant
characterization, although Williamson contends that they function as barely
concealed contempt for conventional religion, which Strauss had
renounced, and more generally that much of the orchestral amplification
serves to exhibit the superficiality of the characters. The most blatant example is
the dissonant quintet of five quarrelling Jews in the opera's only set piece
that has no plausible connection to the rest of the narrative or theme;
apparently intended as comedy or perhaps light-hearted ridicule (complete
with a mocking motif suggesting mindless chatter), it now seems a nasty anti-Semitic stereotype; although inherited from Wilde's play
(his lover later emerged as a virulent anti-Semite), Strauss apparently
had no reservations about including this episode.
Analysts have identified dozens of motifs that
recur throughout the opera. William Mann credits Strauss for depicting in
detail what each character is thinking in order to precisely characterize the
drama. Others, though, distinguish Strauss's use of motifs from the more
predictable "calling cards" of Wagner. Puffett hails the complexity of
Strauss's use of motifs – thus the theme assigned to Narraboth, the
captain of the guard, clings to its original pitches except when he is
anguished. The themes themselves run a vast gamut, from Salome's jagged motif, heard at the very outset, that foretells her decisive rejection of human warmth, through the lush Viennese lilt of the Dance that teases as it drifts languidly around the c-# tonic with a whiff of minor-mode hostility. Especially notable for their persistent recurrence throughout the opera are the two themes for the Prophet, the first of calm dignity and the second a firm rejection of sinful society; the two fundamental variants of Salome's implacable drive for the Prophet's kiss; and, above all, her haunting incessant lust, a fatal combination of allure and danger, that heard naked sends chills through the final minutes. Del Mar, Ayrey,
Carpenter and others have produced meticulous analyses
demonstrating the precision of Salome's microscopic structure and
musical symbolism. While fascinating, the need for such detailed
explication raises a question of just how much of this a listener can
perceive and whether too much of Strauss's musical invention operates at a level
of intellectual subtlety that eludes all but the most trained ear.
Perhaps the opera is best viewed as a hugely impressive product of
its time – as Frances Robinson notes, it is wedged between the final gasp
of monarchy and the rise of Freudian analysis. Ernest Krause goes further,
viewing the opera from a socialist perspective as a product of decadence
"with its craving for sexual satiety and its blindness to reality [in which] the
people are ignored and the characters entangle themselves in webs of
perversely exaggerated passions which distort their view of the world and
make normal relationships with other people impossible." Williamson
contends that from a modern perspective much of the early sense of
immorality has since devolved to kitsch. Puffett provides an apt summary of the diverse commentary by quipping that Salome is
"a rich work – it has something to offer (and offend) everyone." But
whether out of love or hate, few can resist it.
While the opera Salome may seem sui
generis, imposing adaptations of the underlying tale continued to
emerge in music, film and dance.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25a83/25a836b9acff944cebba6f2ab32fb27e8c6e5e26" alt="Nazimova's Salome" Nazimova's Salome |
A 1907 choreographic tone poem by Florent
Schmitt was based on a literary poem by Robert d'Humieres in which John
tries to protect Salome from attack by Herod, the ghost of his head haunts
her, and a cataclysmic volcano buries the entire evil court. (The
calamitous ending may have been inspired by one of Jules Laforgue's
1886 Moralités legendaries (Moral Tales), a parody of the Flaubert
account, that had presented a twist in which Salome falls to her death when she loses
her balance throwing the head out to sea from a promontory.) Both epic
and impressionist, Schmitt's score ends in a savage dance of irregular
rhythm that Stravinsky admired and that may have prompted the finale of
his Rite of Spring.
1923 saw a stunning feature film produced by and starring the exotic
Crimean/American Nazimova (née Miriam Levinton) with sets and
costumes that evoked Beardsley's drawings and subtitles firmly in the
spirit of Wilde ("Thy hair is like the black nights when the moon hides her
face"). Exquisitely paced and full of expressive closeups, it melds the
conventions of silent film with ballet. Teasing with extreme modesty (she
adds veils at the end of her dance and slinks behind a curtain to kiss
Jokanaan's mouth), Nazimova bristles with sexual longing, yet, following
Strauss's vision, acts with great subtlety, and much of her dancing is
comprised of immobile posing. Although incomparable when taken on its
own terms, the film was a flop at the time, fueled in part by aversion to the
lifestyle of Nazimova and the director, Charles Bryant, with whom she
shared a marriage of convenience – both were openly gay, as, rumor had
it, were much of the cast and crew.
Two subsequent cinema incarnations were inventive integrations of a
performance into a backstory. Ken Russell's 1988 Salome's Last
Dance imagines a flamboyant Wilde visiting a brothel where the play is
being staged by prostitutes, while Carlos Saura's 2002 Salome
absorbs a flamenco version into biographies of the principal dancers as
they rehearse. In contrast, Hollywood's take was laughably trite – Rita
Hayworth starring in William Dieterle's 1953 Salome, a predictable
love story complete with stereotyped "oriental" dance music, overwrought
acting by a slobbering Charles Laughton as Herod and a gloating Judith
Anderson as Herodias, and a happy ending as Salome flees her parents
with a handsome palace guard to bask in redemption at the Sermon on the
Mount.
We might also note in passing that the subject was sufficiently
intriguing to spawn pop musical works with little connection beyond the
title.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1708/c1708236b3d600144c077788b7f16d9ddc0df6c8" alt="Maude Allen" Maude Allen as Salome |
Among these were "A Vision of Salome" by Archibald Joyce
available in at least four different versions, "The Passing of Salome," a
rather funereal waltz, "Sal-O-May," a strutting jazzy march by Robert Stolz,
and, most inapt of all, a "Salome Oriental Intermezzo" by William Lorraine
played on a Monarch 78 as a perky solo by Vess L. Ossman, touted in a
spoken introduction as "the banjo king." Perhaps most notable was "Sadie
Salome (Go Home)," the very first success by Irving Berlin (popularized in
1909 by an equally unknown Fanny Brice in her Ziegfeld Follies debut),
which told the comic tale of Sadie Cohen, a sweet local girl who shocks
her boyfriend when he sees her perform: "Don't do that dance, I tell you
Sadie / That's not a bus'ness for a lady! / Oy, Oy, Oy, Oy / Where is your
clothes? / You better go and get your dresses / Ev'ryone's got the op'ra
glasses / Oy! such a sad disgrace / No one looks in your face."
And speaking of risqué theatrical offshoots, perhaps the most
notorious (and successful – 250 London performances in 1908) was
Maud Allen's "Vision of Salome," a music-hall act combining posing and,
as one critic put it, "sensuous gyrations." A Dublin detractor derided (in
great detail) her self-designed diaphanous and highly-revealing costume
(which, he admitted, "a goodly section of the audience applauded very
vigorously") and the New York Sun reported that her "dance [was]
of only one veil and not much of a veil at that. She does not take it off.
She does not need to." (Allen's life was even more sensational than her
staging – her brother was hanged for a double murder, and, shades of
Wilde, she brought and lost a highly-publicized defamation lawsuit against
accusations of sexual perversion made by a member of Parliament who
was known for far-fetched raving that Jews, gays and German spies were
undermining the moral fabric of British society.)
Recordings of Salome face an immediate quandary.
Should an effort be made to intensify the impact of the original in order to
jolt modern listeners who are largely immune from the levels that a
century ago sufficed to overwhelm audiences still immersed in Victorian
propriety (a burden further magnified by having to forego the visual
aspect)? Or should the production be relatively reticent, leaving the
revulsion to be inferred? Strauss presumably would have opted for the
latter, having told the orchestra at the premiere that he wanted a light-toned
lyrical approach that should be played as Mendelssohnian "fairy music,"
like a "scherzo with a fatal conclusion," and having sought a lyric soprano
for the title role, which he envisioned as a chaste but sexy virgin, so as to
add complexity to the character. Indeed, the conductor of the premiere,
Ernest von Schuch, selected and coached by Strauss, was reputed for his
refinement. Yet Strauss was hardly consistent in his counsel, as he
reportedly instructed the orchestra during a rehearsal: "We want
wild beasts here" and admonished them to play louder since he could still
hear the singers. Even so, he chastised Toscanini, who led the Italian
premiere, for having "slaughtered the singers and the drama" beneath a
"piteously raging orchestra" to "perform a symphony without singers" and contrasted it with Germany,
where "the orchestra accompanies and one understands the singers'
every word" – a
curious complaint, in light of the primacy of vocals in Italian opera, of which
Toscanini was a foremost advocate. And while later known for his objective podium style, Strauss was
described toward the launch of his career as doing "a fantastic dance while
conducting," and was scolded by his father, the principal horn of the
Munich court orchestra, for making "snake-like gestures."
John Culshaw, producer of the 1961 Solti recording, raises a telling point –
not all of Strauss's extreme blends of tone color are practicable in the
theatre with a fixed layout of the instruments, but rather are better revealed by
variable deployment of the orchestral forces. Thus Culshaw contends that to capture all the
audible nuances in their correct proportion requires technical intervention
through creative microphone placement and mixing, with the result of
placing the listener closer to the score and thus the drama.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8197d/8197d81ad81866c87e5302c49c0d97c6d774a969" alt="Emmy Destinn" Emmy Destinn as Salome |
Culshaw also notes
the extreme challenges of the score – that singers struggle to sing in one
key while the orchestra plays in a distant one (such as A-minor vs. A-flat major) and that "one operatic soprano in a hundred can sing in tone
and with passion" the "murderous entries on high G" as a frenzied Salome
demands the prophet's mouth. Rests between retakes of brief but
fatiguing fragments – not to mention editing among multiple takes – are
welcome allies unavailable in the theatre but routine techniques in the
studio.
Such technological luxuries were unavailable to the pioneers – for
better (spontaneity) or worse (inhibition, flaws) what they sang went directly
onto the disc. In a 1911 New York Times interview, Johanna
Gadski claimed that she would never sing Salome and that
Strauss had told her: "I don't write my music for people with beautiful
voices like yours." Yet in 1908 she had recorded a brief, 93 second
snippet of "Ich bin verleibt in deinem Leib" ("I am amorous of thy
body"), in which Salome lusts for the (then-living) Jokanaan, in a high,
tremulous, cutting voice without much semblance of craving or temptation.
The year before, Emmy Destinn cut two more compelling sides
from the same scene. Her own "Ich bin verleibt" is noble, as befits
a princess, yet ardent, as suits an adolescent's first overwhelming crush.
Her ensuing "Dein Haar is grässlich!" ("Thy hair is horrible!") drips
with rushed venom and fully reflects her wrath at being snubbed until the final line
("Lass mich ihn küssen, deinin Mund") ("Let me kiss thy mouth") melts into a tender plea. Despite some intonation issues, her
vibrato as well as her overall bearing is exquisitely expressive.
Curiously, the first recording of the final scene, seemingly the most
inviting excerpt for a dramatic soprano, had to await 1921, when an eight-minute
abridgement was cut by German soprano Barbara Kemp. Her
rendition, conducted by Leo Blech (rather than her husband-to-be, c
Von Schillings), is rather lightweight and makes little attempt to convey the
princess's perverse and chaotic emotions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8494/d8494c2b4b9a6efefd034d0b950c3d12b3f001bd" alt="Gota Ljungbert" Gota Ljungberg as Salome |
Yet Strauss deeply admired
her warmth and sought to cast her in the leading roles in many of his
operas, including Salome, and so perhaps her rather reserved
recording reflects his ideal better than other more overtly characterized
ones.
The very end of the acoustical era brought the first substantial set of Salome
excerpts from HMV in 1924 – six very full 12" sides (26˝ minutes total) of
the opening scene (heavily abridged), the first stanza of Jokanaan's harangue
("Wo ist er") couched within churning orchestral passages,
Salome's Dance (two sides) and her concluding apostrophe (abbreviated
to two sides), the last of which is endowed by Göta Ljungberg
with a bracing fusion of purity, command and sheer vocal splendor. The
amount of orchestral detail captured by the archaic apparatus is truly
remarkable and, atypically for acoustic vocal recordings, the balances
do not favor the singers. Albert Coates whips the score into a riveting frenzy,
as might be expected from a conductor known for his extraordinary vitality
on disc.
The most promising set of extended excerpts – potentially, at least –
was led by the composer himself on a set of 78 rpm sides privately recorded by
Hermann May and issued only in 1994 as part of Koch Schwann's
Vienna State Opera Live CD edition.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da909/da909e3dc0271b7e9c5ca54abf801314641d95d6" alt="Richard Strauss conducting" Richard Strauss conducting |
Like the remarkable Mapleson Met
cylinders four decades earlier at the dawn of recording, May's were
captured backstage on amateur equipment – eight sides on February 15,
1942 and three more on May 6 with largely different casts. All present
random 4˝-minute chunks that often end in mid-phrase just as we begin to
settle in. Yet despite that frustration they are invaluable as our only aural
evidence of Strauss conducting one of his operas, albeit decades after its creation, during which his approach had evolved. His style is hard to
characterize – tempos and dynamics are varied but moderated and
textures are generally light, with particular attention to inner voices,
although the sonics are too crude to effectively convey the transparency,
"brilliance and shimmer[ing] with a wide spectrum of nuances" that the
notes proclaim. The vocals, though, display far less finesse. The men
tend to dominate with persistent, heroic declamation, although the
balances may owe more to proximity to the single offstage microphone
than a true reflection of intended audience perspective. Thus, while it seems
thematically appropriate that a curious Salome is barely audible at the
beginning of her confrontation with an assertive Jokanaan, this might not
be intentional. Especially revealing are two sides of the finale, sung with
tangible conviction by Else Schulz, whose acute vibrato evokes
grand opera. Also enlightening is the sixth side, which presents the last
three minutes of the Dance with more grace and inflection than power or
mystery, yet culminating in a potent timpani-fueled climax. In comparison
with Strauss's two studio 78s of the Dance cut in 1916 and 1928, we can't
be sure if the extra refinement and vitality is a function of Strauss's artistic
maturation, his greater sense of freedom in live performance or his
distaste for the sterility of the studio environment. In any event, the
Strauss excerpts belie his undeserved reputation as a lazy, indifferent
conductor and suggest a strong stylistic affinity with his beloved Mozart, a
kinship further evidenced by five sides May recorded in 1941 of
Idomeneo in Strauss's own adaptation for which he wrote a new
intermezzo and finale that are a fascinating blend of the original filtered
through his own late Romantic mindset (and the voices are far more
temperate, thus suggesting that Strauss intended his Salome
singers to be forceful and spirited).
Recordings of the final scene continued. Two seem especially
significant.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5703/f570306b5e4691de6c8b5d5f2527784bd8bf8130" alt="Maude Allen" Marjorie Lawrence as Salome |
In 1934 Marjorie Lawrence, lead soprano for the
Paris Opera, recorded it in French with the Pasdeloup Orchestra and
Piero Coppola, who headed HMV's French branch and led an
extensive series of recordings there. While her interpretation brims with
colorful personality, much is missing in the sheer sound of the translation – "Ah! Tu n'as pas
voulu" lacks the elemental snarl of "Ah! Du wolltest mich nicht"
and forfeits the constant chafing between the alluring music and the rough
edges of the German text. Hearing this all-French production compels
recognition that the German words themselves often abrade the music,
thus comprising a basic level of friction in Strauss's original conception.
That tension is in full evidence in a scorchingly intense 1941 DG Berlin
recording by Maria Cebotari led by Artur Rother. Another
Strauss favorite (although in wartime Germany, for obvious reasons, his
choices were restricted), she intensifies obsession, abetted by the rather
coarse sonic fidelity, and leaves no doubt that the virginal princess has fully
transformed into a full-fledged Wagnerian heroine, at the risk of overly
simplifying the underlying psychology of the plot. (Alas, in lieu of the
standard ending, the music drops off into a set of lulling cadences, thus
undercutting the potency of all that came before.)
Perhaps the most acclaimed of all free-standing final scenes is the
1949 recording by Ljuba Welitsch, cut shortly after her
spectacular Met debut. Francis Robinson, the long-time assistant director
of the Met, claimed that her debut spawned the longest and loudest
ovation he had ever heard.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed869/ed8698562f0aaea3ac643705bd31289bdfec2874" alt="Ljuba Welitsch as Salome" Ljuba Welitsch as Salome |
In a New York Sun review, Irving
Kolodin reported that "the theater was still cheering fifteen minutes after
the final curtain" and hailed both her acting and singing as "nervous,
questing, insatiable, readily aroused to a fury beyond any spurned woman
known to history." Herbert F. Peyser in Musical America noted her
"mass of flaming copper hair" and saluted her bright metallic voice and
vitality that enabled her to "override the heaviest dynamics and penetrate
the densest textures of the sumptuous orchestration." With Fritz Reiner (in
his own Met debut) conducting in a focused, uninflected manner, her
rendition is chilling in its detached brilliance and immediacy that the Earl of
Harewood likened to Jascha Heifetz's violin style. Her depiction of
Salome is of an aloof, coldly calculating princess, whose pure tone admits
no hint of grace or doubt to intrude upon a tightly-focused temperament,
an approach that melds well with Reiner's reputation for nuanced
precision. Fortunately, we also have complete live recordings of 1949 and
1952 Welitsch/Reiner/Met productions. Tim Ashley in the
Guardian hailed the CD release of the latter as "one of the most
famous – and most disturbing – of all operatic performances," citing
"Welitsch's chillingly girlish tone and matchless ability to make the text
sound utterly obscene [and] create an unnervingly realistic portrayal of a
sexually aware, manipulative teenager whose emotions are out of control"
and saluted Reiner as "the greatest of all Straussians, drag[ging] us kicking
and screaming into a world fraught with neurotic tension and psychological
violence." The 1949 version has
brighter sound and catches Welitsch in fresher voice, but both provide
exceptional object lessons in vocal acting. Experts have acclaimed
both as the greatest Salomes on record.
Another highly renowned closing scene was again led by Reiner in late
1955, this time for RCA with the Chicago Symphony Orchestra and
Inge Borkh, who sings in a rich, quavering voice. Known as
much for her acting as her singing, her more shaded tone and expression
is matched by the warmer ambiance Reiner provides, abetted by the early
stereo recording, which spreads the accompaniment over a convincing
soundstage to achieve a sense of atmosphere and display subtleties of
orchestration beyond the reach of a single channel to convey. Borkh, too,
left us a celebrated complete Met performance. While Dmitri Mitropoulos
leads tempestuous orchestral interludes, the sustained intensity (partly a
function of heavy dynamic compression) brooks no chance for respite or a
hint of tenderness, even as Salome first marvels over the Prophet's body
and tenderly (if perversely) basks in contemplation of her kiss in the finale.
Indeed, Borkh's unflagging huge voice seems downright Wagnerian and
too lush – more a worldly Brünhilde than a raw adolescent, albeit a driven
one.
In considering complete recordings of Salome, I
tend to focus on the conductor, Salome and Herod if only by default, as
the other major roles seem mostly one-dimensional and thus present little
opportunity for interpretive personality – the Captain of the Guard
Narraboth is hopelessly stricken with Salome but bound by duty, the Page
constantly warns him of the disastrous consequences of his forbidden
desire, Herodias is relentlessly driven by disgust for her husband and maniacal hatred
of Jokanaan, who, in turn, prophesizes with inflexible ideology (except for a
brief ecstatic vision in which he implores Salome to seek Christ). All are
rendered quite well, if predictably, in all the recordings I've heard. At the
other extreme, interpreters of Salome are faced with the daunting, if not
inherently impossible, task of depicting a character who evolves in the
course of an hour's real time from bewildered to lustful, manipulative, cruel and
finally deranged. The comprehensive Operadis website lists
79 complete Salome recordings as of 2009 of which I've focused on
studio renditions. The following headnotes list: the
conductor; the singers of Salome, Herod, Jokanaan, Herodias; the
orchestra (the original label, the year of first issue).
- Joseph Keilberth; Christel Goltz, Josef Herrmann, Bernd
Aldenhoff, Inger Karén; Dresden Staatskapelle (Oceanic LP, 1948)
This was the first complete Salome to have been released.
Needless to say, that in itself is significant, as the full force of the finale
can truly be felt only as the culmination of the rest, rather than as a free-standing set piece. Goltz was famed for this role and was known for her
range, volume and intensity. Although spared the need for such stamina
here, she routinely did the Dance herself, although it undoubtedly helped
that she had been born into a family of acrobats and trained as a dancer
before turning to singing. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43ea1/43ea1fa8876ac640125efc86edb8f75c4a3e06fd" alt="Moralt conducts Salome (Philips LP cover)" Her apostrophe is especially chilling, as she
intones her depraved lines in a pure, sweet girlish timbre, adding an
uncommon layer of perversion to a complex portrait of a brat way out of
her depth. Like most of the singers and conductors in Salome
recordings, Keilberth was known as a Wagner interpreter. Yet as an
extension of the stylistic example of Strauss's own recording, and fully
consistent with Goltz's approach, the entire production displays crystalline
diction sufficient to imply characterization without sacrificing the emotional
content, compromising the musical flow or breaking a musical line, thus
treading a subtle edge between the classicism of Mozartean influence and
the modern toxicity of the plot. The sound has remarkable clarity for its
age and source. Actually a recorded radio broadcast, it benefits from the
continuity of a live performance without expending the considerable
energy required for staging and the inevitable resulting problems of balance. It also
boasts the pedigree of having emanated from Dresden, where the
premiere had been given.
- Rudolf Moralt; Walburga Wegner, Josef Metternich,
László Szemere, Georgine von Milinkovic; Vienna Symphony
(Philips, 1952)
Perhaps because both conductor and cast had primarily local (albeit
worthy) reputations, this recording is often overlooked. Yet it is significant
as the very first studio recording of Salome. It also boasts a
special pedigree of its own – Moralt was Strauss's nephew, although
biographies do not suggest a strong professional bond. His brief
discography focuses on Wagner (including a complete recorded
Ring) and Mozart (three complete operas) – a suitable blend for
Salome, as his fleet timing creates a propulsive sense of
inevitability while conveying the density of the music, despite an overly
bright recording. As chief conductor at the Vienna State Opera from 1940
to 1958, Moralt focused his energies on restoring the excellence of that
famed ensemble, and so it seems appropriate that he didn't feel
compelled to populate his cast with outside stars. The voices are credible
if not especially distinguished, but that serves to keep the production on a
human scale. Volume is used creatively to reflect the balance of
personalities – thus, Salome's repeated demands for the prophet's head
are constantly buried beneath Herod's desperate attempts to dissuade
her, and her final line is not the usual lung-busting, ringing triumph but
withers in exhausted ambivalence. A rudimentary sound effect (the
earliest I've encountered among Salome recordings) adds echo
when Salome first peers down into the cistern and to Jokanaan's lines
from within it. Incidentally, as if to emphasize the need to apply one's own
critical perspective and to take professional views with a proverbial grain of
salt, two Musical America reviews of Wegner's 1952 Met
appearances (in Strauss's Elektra) generated vastly different reactions –
Robert Sabine hailed her blazing intensity, while Cecil Smith asserted
"Nature's firm intention that she restrict herself to music that is
gentler."
- Clemens Krauss; Christel Goltz, Hans Braun, Julius
Patzak, Margareta Kenney; Vienna Philharmonic
(Decca/London, 1954)
Of all the Salome conductors on record, Krauss had the
closest relationship to Strauss, as he prepared the premieres of three late
operas under the composer's direction, wrote the libretto for
Capriccio and recorded the first full set of the tone poems (after
Strauss's own series). Thus it seems appropriate that this Salome, his
penultimate recording, combines the conventional style of the late Strauss
operas with the lush romanticism of the Strauss tone poems, abetted by
the famed opulent sound of the Vienna Philharmonic. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/def1e/def1e7115bbc3f2314c5b18b551d9ed3a1c32d27" alt="Solti conducts Salome (London LP cover)" The Dance, shorn
of its ingrained edge, is especially smooth and silky, and perhaps all the
more creepy by hiding its undertone of depravity beneath an aura of
alluring charm. Elsewhere, though, the sting needed to fully convey the
expressionist impact is veiled beneath glossy execution and the final
chords are bereft of their needed shock. Goltz, sounding considerably
more mature than in 1948, is both more expressive (as when she whispers
her anxiety waiting for the executioner to perform) and grand, culminating
in a sumptuous apostrophe brimming with beauty and splendor that is all
the more unsettling in contrast to the chilling tale. Julius Patzak renders
Herod with a wide range of expression, from barely stylized speech to full
song.
- Georg Solti; Birgit Nilsson, Gerhard Stolze, Eberhard
Wachter, Grace Hoffman; Vienna Philharmonic (Decca/London,
1961)
This first stereo Salome was produced by the same team of
soprano, orchestra, conductor and technical crew that was in the midst of
crafting the first stereo Ring. In accompanying notes, the engineers boasted that their
innovation of "resonance control" (i.e., precise control of acoustics) was
"the greatest single development in recorded opera since the inception of
stereophonic sound." While that may seem dubious nowadays, they were writing when stereo itself was barely a decade old. Even so, their
achievement remains stunning, with an astounding balance of
vibrant atmosphere, incisive detail and sheer sonic power. (I can't vouch
for various CD transfers – I'm sticking with my near-mint original vinyl set
that sounds sensational.) The orchestral impression is rich with gripping
bass yet blazing with sharp, vivid highlights, precisely balanced against the
voices so as to overwhelm them at dramatically appropriate times. Astride
it all is Nilsson, whose awesome purity, breath control and sheer power
affords her the luxury of exquisite coloring and subtlety without a hint of
strain or compromising her mesmerizing presence that dominates every
moment she is heard and reverberates in the interstices. Her interview
with Jokanaan begins as beguiled and evolves into a hair-raising
confrontation. When she pleads with Herod for the prophet's head she
lets him dominate, never raising her voice above patient, insistent
conversation throughout his hysterics, yet we know from her first confident,
hypnotic note who will prevail. Her apostrophe, resplendent with tonal beauty and effortless vocal production, paints a portrait of self-assured triumph, a Brünhilde oblivious to all else and set on an inexorable
course toward her own destiny. Her final lines are barely audible until the
very end, drawing us deeply one final time into her sick, eerie, private world.
Even a half-century later, it's hard to imagine a more thrilling, visceral
Salome (or a scarier cover!).
- Otmar Suitner; Christel Goltz, Helmut Melchert, Ernst
Gutstein, Siw Ericsdotter; Dresden Staatskapelle (Eterna LP,
1963)
Like the Moralt, this set, too, is often overlooked, perhaps because East German
imports weren't keenly sought in the West at the height of the Cold War. A Krauss student, Suitner has a fine feel for the score – objective but never dull,
letting the inherent drama develop with minimal personal input and a
superb balance that conveys all the instrumental splendor without ever
calling attention to itself. Not only the Dance, but other orchestral
passages (notably Jokanaan emerging from and returning to the cistern)
are atmospheric, propulsive and hugely effective, spiced by rousing
timpani. (An unusual benevolent touch – the Jews' quarrel sounds more
like a heated discussion than a mean-spirited fight, and he eliminates
altogether their silly cries of "Oh, oh, oh" when Herod, in desperation but to
no avail, offers Salome the veil of the tabernacle if she will spare
Jokanaan.) Yet while the supporting cast of relative unknowns is decent
enough, the result remains deeply flawed. Salome, after all, is
Salome. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d6e3/1d6e3d1d93a9253d9d579548b4320b6ac22dcb69" alt="Leinsdorf conducts Salome (RCA LP cover)" In her third studio recording (no other soprano boasts even two),
Goltz has lost the character, appeal and control of her former outings
and instead shakes all her held notes with fearsome tremolo and sounds
like an aging diva. Her sheer power remains and dominates throughout,
but judging from her voice alone (as we must), she could never be
mistaken for a youthful innocent prone to corruption, nor bend the captain
of the guard, let alone Herod, to her will, but rather merely shouts them all
down, even in the crucial scene when she repeatedly demands the
Prophet's head, neither steadfastly nor with rising intensity, and during the final oration she sounds merely exhausted rather than
exulting in triumph.
Despite an inflated stereo spread, the sonic fidelity is convincing, although
for some reason Herod is miked with an annoying metallic overtone and
other voices are heard with curiously different degrees of presence.
- Erich Leinsdorf; Montserrat Caballé, Richard Lewis,
Sherrill Milnes, Regina Resnik; London Symphony (RCA,
1968)
The Solti production was a formidable act to follow, but if it seems too
garish or extreme then this rendition should amply satisfy. Leinsdorf's
career began in opera, where he trained under both Toscanini and Walter,
and thus brings a compelling blend of his mentors' meticulous precision and
atmospheric empathy that tends to flow smoothly rather than in edgy fits.
Appropriately, RCA's sonics are far more natural than Decca's (here, too,
I'm judging from vinyl) yet with creative details. Thus, to add echo for the
cistern Milnes sang into a large metallic exhaust hood over a stove in the
venue kitchen. Much of Herod's lines, even when agitated, are nestled
within the instrumentation, as if to depict him as a petty man, impotent to
control his surroundings, much less his wife or daughter. Caballé,
renowned for bel canto, renders a warm and deeply moving
apostrophe in which we can sense human emotions within the horrifying
context, as if an ardent lover was pouring out her innermost cravings to an
absent object of irresistible desire. Overall, this remains a fine, idiomatic
realization that grows with familiarity. In 1977 Caballé cut the finale for DG
with Bernstein and the Orchestre National de France; as would be
expected it's vastly different, propelled by the conductor's trademark muscular force and bursting with overt vehemence.
- Karl Bohm; Gwyneth Jones, Richard Cassily, Dietrich
Fischer-Dieskau, Mignon Dunn; Hamburg State Opera (DG,
1970)
Technically not a studio recording, this was cobbled from live performances
and rehearsals, but unlike others it was planned for commercial release
and made by a major label on professional equipment with a hushed
audience and minimal stage noise. Bohm was an associate of Strauss,
the dedicatee of his 1938 opera Daphne, and known for reliable,
stable renditions with due attention to detail, and an extra dollop of energy
outside the studio. Here, at age 76, he's commendably brisk, although the
voices' higher level and sharper presence elevates their sense of drama at
the expense of the orchestra, whose contributions sound muted by
comparison, with the Dance especially deflated. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93e00/93e00f4864f1a0ad71c3a61a27ab05700cf42b77" alt="Karajan conducts Salome (EMI LP cover)" Jones is a Wagnerian
soprano, but with a lighter voice and wider emotional range to fulfill the
perceptive psychological vision of the producer August Everding, who considers Salome to be "a
white dove with a young, innocent girl's tendency toward depravity [who]
has learned to so despise her mother's unchastity that she confronts men
with chaste superiority until one man confronts her with chaste superiority
of his own," "a closed white flower … exposed to the rays of a dazzling
sun – Jokanaan, whose rejection of her advances awakens her so that the
flower opens and perishes." Jones's finale, in particular, is uncommonly sweet and
thus all the more perverse. Fischer-Dieskau is largely wasted in the role of
the Prophet, which demands little of his trademarked sensitivity and
heartfelt expression. The booklet with the LP set provides a fascinating
comparison between the libretto and the full original French text of Wilde's play (and an
English translation), conveniently marked to indicate the portions Strauss
cut or altered.
- Herbert von Karajan; Hildegard Behrens, Karl-Walter
Böhm, José Van Dam, Agnes Baltsa; Vienna Philharmonic
(Angel, 1977)
In keeping with his reputation for control and highly-polished precision,
Karajan leads with a rather attenuated, leisurely-paced feeling of mystery
that suggests ancient legend – until the final scene, which blooms into full-
blown romanticism. Others praise the reading as sensual or even ironic,
but I wouldn't go quite that far; rather, although certainly avoiding both the
calculated objectivity of much of Karajan's work as well as the electric
excitement of others', sonorities are richly blended, with sufficient detail
but without calling undue attention to the components, and the orchestral
contribution largely is content to serve as accompaniment, as it would be in
the opera house pit, leaving the singers to characterize their roles.
(Although produced and released by EMI, the technical crew was Decca's,
and the result, with substantial emphasis on the mid-range, differed from
their customary emphatic sound.) Behrens, a Karajan discovery making
her debut on records, was already 40 at the time and sounds warm and
expressive, but manages to kindle considerable charm as she lures
Narraboth into letting Jokanaan out of the cistern, and then just as easily
turns it off when her mood darkens.
- Seiji Ozawa; Jessye Norman, James Morris, Walter
Raffeiner, Kerstin Witt; Dresden Staatskapelle (Philips, 1990)
- Zubin Mehta; Éva Marton, Bernd Weikl, Heinz Zednik, Brigitte
Fassbaender; Berlin Philharmonic (Sony, 1990)
- Giuseppe Sinopoli; Cheryl Studer, Bryn Terfel, Horst
Hiestermann, Leonie Rysanek; Deutsche Oper Berlin (DG,
1990)
After a considerable drought, 1990 brought a bounty of no fewer than
three studio Salomes. Expert opinions on these tend to be more
amusing than revealing, as each variously praises a different one at the
expense of the others, but perhaps the lack of a consensus is warranted
by their distinctive natures and appeal. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa20f/fa20f6ff43e1c106559f3a96a4452d4813278342" alt="Sinopoli conducts Salome (DG CD cover)" Norman's light vibrato hints at
youthfulness toward the top of her wide range (and spares us the full diva
treatment at the end), but her creamy, near-mezzo tone predominates and
denies much sense of evolution (and, in an unusual role reversal, sounds
deeper than her mother). She's especially convincing when singing of
dark things (peering into the cistern; pondering the Prophet's hair). Yet the
sheer luster of her tone and phrasing is intoxicating, although it tends to
negate characterization and often overpowers the accompaniment, once
again by the Dresden forces, this time led by Ozawa, who often seems
more dutiful than engaged. Mehta, while more responsive, unleashes
the accustomed excellence of the Berlin Philharmonic during the
orchestral passages of Jokanaan's return to the cistern and a fine, moody
Dance seething with delicacy and grace, but otherwise largely hides
beneath the voices. Marton, though, from the outset is far more matronly
than vulnerable or impressionable and tends to blunt any sense of
atmosphere or psychic progression. In my personal favorite of the 1990 crop of
Salomes, Sinopoli, known for his deeply intellectual approach to
music and his sensitivity to textures, crafts radiant support for the
variegated expressive breadth of Studer, who shapes every word with
dramatic purpose and conversational ease, especially in softer passages
in which she demands our attention more than in overly insistent segments
and constantly contrasts her placid textures to Herod's hysterics and
Jokanaan's stentorian moralizing. As in the Bohm LP box, the CD booklet
compares Wilde's full original text with Strauss's
abridged libretto. The sonic allure of all three of these sets is terrific.
- Christoph von Dohnányi; Catherine Malfitano, Bryn
Terfel, Kenneth Riegel, Hanna Schwarz; Vienna Philharmonic
(Decca, 1994)
Dohnányi leads the Vienna Philharmonic in yet another studio
Salome in a surprisingly relaxed and steady (one might say
featureless) reading, complete with a rather perfunctory Dance, far from
the expected dynamism one might expect from a student of Bernstein and
Solti. Even so, uncommon details emerge here and there – ironic dreamy
arpeggios as Herod rhapsodizes over Salome's request for a silver platter
before he learns what she wants on it, and a dynamic voicing of the spooky
"Salome chord" before her final lines. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/838ef/838efc70a247dcb900204d8bb30cf8e636d0cc3e" alt="Mackerras conducts Salome (Chandos CD cover)" Yet, I can't help but feel that a more
vivid approach is needed, especially nowadays, in order to impart even a
small measure of the essential shock that Salome generated in its
time (and that the composer clearly intended). By slighting the orchestral
contribution, Dohnányi relegates the dominant role to the vocals, as seems
proper in any opera. Fortunately, Maltifano impresses as a fine singing
actress, with a warbling voice that, unlike Goltz in 1963, she uses
expressively for tightly-wound nervous energy (and with a lighter texture)
for an apt portrayal of a girl who ventures way beyond the scope of her shallow adolescent emotional depth.
Despite her ability to unleash full power, she often exercises considerable
restraint and manages to exude plausible allure.
- Charles Mackerras; Susan Bullock, John Graham-Hall,
John Wegner, Sally Burgess, Andrew Rees; Philharmonia
Orchestra (Chandos CD, 2008)
This recording boasts a unique
feature – it's rendered entirely in an English translation (by Tom
Hammond). To match the scansion and music, most of the lines fit rather
well – the opening phrase "Wie schön is die Prinzessin Salome heute
Nacht" becomes "How fair the royal Princess Salome looks tonight."
Yet others are unavoidably awkward. Thus the very final line, Herod's
"Man töte dieses Weib!," becomes "Go kill that woman there." (The
bilingual vocal score renders it somewhat better as "Go, kill at once that
wench" – still a bit gauche but a better reflection of the sound of the
German. The Douglas English version of the play states plainly: "Kill that woman.")
Yet even beyond imprecise rhythmic fit, the English language lacks the
inherent snarl that adds immeasurably to an aura of perversity. Sir Thomas
Beecham reportedly sought to assure wary London censors that few
would understand the German text anyway. Ironically, this recording
proves him prescient, but for reasons other than a lack of facility in the
original language – despite our fluency with the English words, and despite
the clarity of the recording, much of the text remains obscure, and not
merely due to the occasional density of the instrumentation. In theory,
opera in translation is a fine idea, as those not conversant with the original
tongue can focus on the intricate bond (and, here, deliberate abrasion) of
words and music without need of the distraction of a libretto, somewhat
akin to reveling in the visuals of a well-dubbed foreign movie as the director
intended, rather than being confined to the bottom of the screen for
subtitles. Yet, only the rapid words of stylized declamation in natural
rhythm (if with exaggerated tones) are readily understood here, while much
of the rest, including the drawn-out apostrophe, is hard to grasp without a
libretto (or at least a detailed knowledge of the narrative), thus defeating
the purpose of translation in the first place.
Issued 14 years after the prior studio Salome, the Mackerras set
serves to raise two related questions. First, in light of the economic
pressures that increasingly threaten the traditional model for recording
major works, will there be any more studio Salomes? And, second,
given the added inspiration captured in most concert presentations and the
enhanced experience afforded by video, does it even matter? But those are questions for another day.
The facts, references and quotations in this article are taken from the following
sources. Unless otherwise noted, I'll take the credit – and blame – for the
musical judgments.
- ABOUT STRAUSS
- Del Mar, Norman: Richard Strauss – A Critical Commentary
on His Life and Works (Cornell, 1986)
- Gillam, Bryan: Richard Strauss and His World (Princeton,
1992)
- Krause, Ernst: Richard Strauss – The Man and His Music
(Crescendo Publishing, 1969)
- Mailland, J. A.: "Strauss" (article in Grove's Dictionary of Music and
Musicians [1908 edition])
- Marek, George: Richard Strauss – The Life of a Non-Hero
(Simon & Schuster, 1967)
- Strauss, Richard: Betrachtungen und Erinnerungen [Views and
Memories] in Piero Weiss and Richard Taruskin, Music in the Western
World – a History in Documents (Schirmer, 1984)
- ABOUT WILDE
- Wilde, Oscar: The Importance of Being Earnest and Other
Plays, introduction by Sylvan Barnet (Signet, 1985) [includes
Salome]
- Wilde, Oscar: The Picture of Dorian Gray (preface) (Project
Gutenburg eBook, 2008)
- ABOUT SALOME
- Puffitt, Derrick: Richard Strauss's Salome (Cambridge
Opera Handbook) (Cambridge University Press, 1989), including the
following articles:
- Ayrey, Craig: "Salome's Final Monologue"
- Carpenter, Tethys: "Tonal and Dramatic Structure"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5d8d/e5d8d44482b7fb9f43830e3357649047bb256203" alt="Beardsley: The Burial of Salome" Beardsley: The Burial of Salome |
- Holloway, Robin: "Salome – Art or Kitsch?"
- Praz, Marie: "Salome in Literary Tradition"
- Puffitt, Derrick: "Images of Salome"
- Tenschert, Roland: "Strauss as Librettist"
- Williamson, John: "Critical Reception"
- Abert, Anna Amalie: notes to the Karajan LP box (Angel SLBX-3848,
1978)
- Becker, Henry: notes to the Bernstein CD of the finale (DG 431 171-2,
1987)
- Beecham, Sir Thomas: A Mingled Chime (Putnam, 1943)
- Culshaw, John: notes to the Solti LP box (London OSA 1218, 1961)
- Earl of Harewood: notes to "Ljuba Welitsch: The Complete Columbia Recordings" (Sony MH2K 62866, 1997)
- Everding, August: notes to the Bohm LP box (DG 2707 052, 1970)
- Goodall, Howard: The Story of Music From Babylon to the Beatles
– How Music Has Shaped Civilization (Pegasus, 2013)
- Mann, William: Richard Strauss – A Critical Study of the
Operas (Oxford, 1966)
- Mohr, Richard and Erich Leinsdorf – notes to the Leinsdorf LP box
(RCA LSC-7053, 1968)
- Owens, Susan: Aubrey Beardsley's Salome and Satire
(Doctoral Thesis, University College, London, 2002)
- Robinson, Frances: notes to the Reiner LP of the final scene (RCA
LM-6047, 1956)
- Williamson, John: notes to the Sinopoli CD Box (DG 431 810-2, 1991)
- MISCELLANY
- Carse, Adam: The History of Orchestration (Kagan, Paul,
Trench, Trubner & Co., 1925)
- Lang, Paul Henry: Music in Western Civilization (Norton, 1941)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5507c/5507c945c7510bde8765e97af895a53265595904" alt="Peter Gutmann"
Copyright 2015 by Peter Gutmann
|